ace (c49b1)
Analytical Continuum Solvent (ACS) Potential
Purpose: calculate solvation free energy and forces based on
a continuum description of the solvent, in particular the analytical
continuum electrostatics (ACE) potential.
Please report problems to Michael Schaefer at schaefer@piaf.u-strasbg.fr
WARNING: The module is still being developed and may change in the future.
!======================================================================!
! Note on ACE2: the version 2 of ACE as of Jan 2002 is not yet fully !
! parameterized; it yields reasonably stably MD trajectories of native !
! proteins when using param19 (united atom parameters), but is !
! unreliable with all-hydrogen parameters. !
!======================================================================!
REFERENCES:
M. Schaefer & M. Karplus (1996) J. Phys. Chem. 100, 1578-1599.
M. Schaefer, C. Bartels & M. Karplus (1998) J. Mol. Biol. 284, 835-847.
N. Calimet, M. Schaefer & T. Simonson, (2001) Proteins 45, 144-158
M. Schaefer, C. Bartels, F. Leclerc& M. Karplus (2001),
J. Comp. Chem. 22, 1857-1879.
* Syntax | Syntax of the ACE specifications
* Defaults | Defaults and Recommended values
* Function | Purpose of each of the specifications
* Examples | Usage examples of the ACE module
Purpose: calculate solvation free energy and forces based on
a continuum description of the solvent, in particular the analytical
continuum electrostatics (ACE) potential.
Please report problems to Michael Schaefer at schaefer@piaf.u-strasbg.fr
WARNING: The module is still being developed and may change in the future.
!======================================================================!
! Note on ACE2: the version 2 of ACE as of Jan 2002 is not yet fully !
! parameterized; it yields reasonably stably MD trajectories of native !
! proteins when using param19 (united atom parameters), but is !
! unreliable with all-hydrogen parameters. !
!======================================================================!
REFERENCES:
M. Schaefer & M. Karplus (1996) J. Phys. Chem. 100, 1578-1599.
M. Schaefer, C. Bartels & M. Karplus (1998) J. Mol. Biol. 284, 835-847.
N. Calimet, M. Schaefer & T. Simonson, (2001) Proteins 45, 144-158
M. Schaefer, C. Bartels, F. Leclerc& M. Karplus (2001),
J. Comp. Chem. 22, 1857-1879.
* Syntax | Syntax of the ACE specifications
* Defaults | Defaults and Recommended values
* Function | Purpose of each of the specifications
* Examples | Usage examples of the ACE module
Top
Syntax
[SYNTAX ACE functions]
Syntax: The ACE specifications can be specified any time the nbond
specification parser is invoked, e.g.,
ENERgy [other-spec] [ace-spec]
ace-spec::=
[ ACE ] [ IEPS real ] [ SEPS real ] [ ALPHa real ]
[ SIGMa real ] [ IDEAl | CURRent ] [FVSCaling real]
[ ACE2 [ MXBSolv real ] [TBSOlv real ] [ TBSHydrogens real ]]
Syntax
[SYNTAX ACE functions]
Syntax: The ACE specifications can be specified any time the nbond
specification parser is invoked, e.g.,
ENERgy [other-spec] [ace-spec]
ace-spec::=
[ ACE ] [ IEPS real ] [ SEPS real ] [ ALPHa real ]
[ SIGMa real ] [ IDEAl | CURRent ] [FVSCaling real]
[ ACE2 [ MXBSolv real ] [TBSOlv real ] [ TBSHydrogens real ]]
Top
The defaults for the ACE potential are:
IEPS 1.0
SEPS 80.0
ALPHa 1.3
SIGMa 0.0
IDEAl true
FVSCa 1.0
The additional defaults for the ACE2 potential are:
MXBSo 14.0
TBSOl 8.4
TBSHy 3.85
In the current implementation, ACE should be used with united atom parameters,
ALPHa set equal to 1.3, the standard PARAM19 parameter file param19.inp and
Voronoi volumes as given in acepar19.inp (toppar and test/data).
The defaults for the ACE potential are:
IEPS 1.0
SEPS 80.0
ALPHa 1.3
SIGMa 0.0
IDEAl true
FVSCa 1.0
The additional defaults for the ACE2 potential are:
MXBSo 14.0
TBSOl 8.4
TBSHy 3.85
In the current implementation, ACE should be used with united atom parameters,
ALPHa set equal to 1.3, the standard PARAM19 parameter file param19.inp and
Voronoi volumes as given in acepar19.inp (toppar and test/data).
Top
0. Introduction
The analytical continuum solvent (ACS) potential is introduced to
perform molecular dynamics/minimization calculations with a continuum
approximation of the solvent.
Two solvent contributions to the effective (free) energy of a solute
are included: the electrostatic solvation free energy, and the
non-polar (i.e., non-electrostatic) solvation free energy.
The first (electrostatic) contribution (G_el) is calculated using an
analytical approximation to the solution of the Poisson-equation
called ACE (from: analytical continuum electrostatics).
The non-polar solvation free energy (G_np) is approximated by a pairwise
potential which yields results that are very similar to the well-known
surface area approximations of the hydrophobic (solvation) energy
(e.g., Wesson and Eisenberg, Prot. Sci. 1 (1992), 227--235; see
the ASP potential in CHARMM).
Restriction:
The ACE solvation potential has to be used together with no cutoff or with
atom based switching.
Compatibility:
1. ACE can be used with BLOCK (but: the diagonal elements of the BLOCK
matrix MUST NOT be zero).
2. ACE can be used with fixing atoms (CONS FIX); the resulting energy and
forces are an approximation, because all the interaction-dielectric terms
of the potential (eq (47) in Schaefer & Karplus, JPC 100 (1996), 1578)
which involve two fixed atoms are neglected, despite the fact that they
exist and that they are not invariant!
Meaning of the ACE parameters:
1. IEPS
Dielectric constant for the space occupied by the atoms that are treated
explicitly, e.g., the space occupied by the protein.
2. SEPS
Dielectric constant for the space occupied by the solvent that is treated
as a continuum (i.e., the complement of the space occupied by the protein).
3. ALPHa
The volumes occupied by individual (protein) atoms are described by
Gaussian density distributions. The factor ALPHa controls the width of these
Gaussians. The net volume of the individual atom Gaussian distributions is
defined in the volume table in the parameter file acepar19.inp.
The volumes in the acepar19.inp file are expected to work best
for an ALPHa of 1.3.
4. SIGMa
The ACE solvation potential includes a hydrophobic contribution
which is roughly proportional to the solvent accessible surface area.
The factor SIGMa scales the hydrophobic contribution. For peptides
with about 10-15 residues, a SIGMa factor of 3.0 results in hydrophobic
contributions that are approximately equal to the solvent accessible
surface area multiplied by 8 cal/(mol*A*A).
4. IDEAl | CURRent
As of c29a2, the ACE potential considers the distances between atoms
in the nonbonded exclusion list as invariant. This is consistent with
the assumption that the forces involving these atoms are governed by
the internal energy terms (bond, angle, and some 1-4 atom pairs in
aromatic ring systems). Note that solvation forces still apply to
pairs of these atoms, considered as a polar group.
With the IDEAl option (default), ACE calculates the nonbonded exclusion
list distances from ideal bond length and angles where possible; the
distances for 1-4 atom pairs in the exclusion list are calculated
from the current atom positions at the first ACE energy call.
With the CURRent option, all the distances between atoms in
the nonbonded exlusion list are calculated from the current
coordinates of the atoms. These distances are considered invariant
for all subsequent energy calls, during minimization and dynamics.
Recalculation of the nb-exclusion list atom pair distance is
enforced only when toggling IDEAl on/off, fixing/unfixing atoms,
or a change of the psf (e.g., REPLica).
4. FVSCal
One major problem with ACE1 (and gneralized Born methods in general)
is the overestimation of the desolvation by the pairwise de-screening
function ESELFIK (see ace.src). One way to reduce the impact of this
systematic error is to reduce the volume that is assigned to the atoms
by a constant factor FVSCal < 1 as proposed in Calimet et al., Proteins
45 (2001), 144-158. The default value for FVSCal is 1.0, though a value
of 0.9 appears reasonable in conjunction with param19 and volumes
in acepar19, using the ACE1 potential (work in progress). Note that
the modified treatment of the self energy (de-screening) potential
in ACE2 is aimed at fixing the overestimation problem of ESELFIK
such that the re-scaling of volumes becomes obsolete (work in progress).
4. ACE2
The ACE2 keyword implies ACE (no need to specify both). It invokes
a modified treatment of the Born solvation radii which are limited
by un upper bound --- MXBSolv (see below). This takes account of the
overestimation of the desolvation of charges by the pairwise de-screening
potential in ACE1.
4. MXBSolv
The Born solvation radii of all atoms (charges) are limited
by the upper bound parameter MXBSolv (default 14.0 Angstrom).
4. TBSOl
In the ACE2 potential, the conventional conversion of the atomic
solvation to the Born solvation radii is applied until a Born radius
of TBSOlv is obtained ("turning point"). After that, atomic solvation
energies (i.e., the de-solvation) is converted in a way that prevents
the Born solvation radii from exceeding the imposed maximum.
Details will be given in an upcoming publication.
4. TBSHyd
This parameter has the same meaning as TBSOl, but applies
to hydrogens, which are most susceptible to an overestimation
of the desolvation by neighboring atoms (volumes). The smaller
the TBSOl and TBSHyd, the more the over-desceening is counter-
acted (parametrization in progress).
0. Introduction
The analytical continuum solvent (ACS) potential is introduced to
perform molecular dynamics/minimization calculations with a continuum
approximation of the solvent.
Two solvent contributions to the effective (free) energy of a solute
are included: the electrostatic solvation free energy, and the
non-polar (i.e., non-electrostatic) solvation free energy.
The first (electrostatic) contribution (G_el) is calculated using an
analytical approximation to the solution of the Poisson-equation
called ACE (from: analytical continuum electrostatics).
The non-polar solvation free energy (G_np) is approximated by a pairwise
potential which yields results that are very similar to the well-known
surface area approximations of the hydrophobic (solvation) energy
(e.g., Wesson and Eisenberg, Prot. Sci. 1 (1992), 227--235; see
the ASP potential in CHARMM).
Restriction:
The ACE solvation potential has to be used together with no cutoff or with
atom based switching.
Compatibility:
1. ACE can be used with BLOCK (but: the diagonal elements of the BLOCK
matrix MUST NOT be zero).
2. ACE can be used with fixing atoms (CONS FIX); the resulting energy and
forces are an approximation, because all the interaction-dielectric terms
of the potential (eq (47) in Schaefer & Karplus, JPC 100 (1996), 1578)
which involve two fixed atoms are neglected, despite the fact that they
exist and that they are not invariant!
Meaning of the ACE parameters:
1. IEPS
Dielectric constant for the space occupied by the atoms that are treated
explicitly, e.g., the space occupied by the protein.
2. SEPS
Dielectric constant for the space occupied by the solvent that is treated
as a continuum (i.e., the complement of the space occupied by the protein).
3. ALPHa
The volumes occupied by individual (protein) atoms are described by
Gaussian density distributions. The factor ALPHa controls the width of these
Gaussians. The net volume of the individual atom Gaussian distributions is
defined in the volume table in the parameter file acepar19.inp.
The volumes in the acepar19.inp file are expected to work best
for an ALPHa of 1.3.
4. SIGMa
The ACE solvation potential includes a hydrophobic contribution
which is roughly proportional to the solvent accessible surface area.
The factor SIGMa scales the hydrophobic contribution. For peptides
with about 10-15 residues, a SIGMa factor of 3.0 results in hydrophobic
contributions that are approximately equal to the solvent accessible
surface area multiplied by 8 cal/(mol*A*A).
4. IDEAl | CURRent
As of c29a2, the ACE potential considers the distances between atoms
in the nonbonded exclusion list as invariant. This is consistent with
the assumption that the forces involving these atoms are governed by
the internal energy terms (bond, angle, and some 1-4 atom pairs in
aromatic ring systems). Note that solvation forces still apply to
pairs of these atoms, considered as a polar group.
With the IDEAl option (default), ACE calculates the nonbonded exclusion
list distances from ideal bond length and angles where possible; the
distances for 1-4 atom pairs in the exclusion list are calculated
from the current atom positions at the first ACE energy call.
With the CURRent option, all the distances between atoms in
the nonbonded exlusion list are calculated from the current
coordinates of the atoms. These distances are considered invariant
for all subsequent energy calls, during minimization and dynamics.
Recalculation of the nb-exclusion list atom pair distance is
enforced only when toggling IDEAl on/off, fixing/unfixing atoms,
or a change of the psf (e.g., REPLica).
4. FVSCal
One major problem with ACE1 (and gneralized Born methods in general)
is the overestimation of the desolvation by the pairwise de-screening
function ESELFIK (see ace.src). One way to reduce the impact of this
systematic error is to reduce the volume that is assigned to the atoms
by a constant factor FVSCal < 1 as proposed in Calimet et al., Proteins
45 (2001), 144-158. The default value for FVSCal is 1.0, though a value
of 0.9 appears reasonable in conjunction with param19 and volumes
in acepar19, using the ACE1 potential (work in progress). Note that
the modified treatment of the self energy (de-screening) potential
in ACE2 is aimed at fixing the overestimation problem of ESELFIK
such that the re-scaling of volumes becomes obsolete (work in progress).
4. ACE2
The ACE2 keyword implies ACE (no need to specify both). It invokes
a modified treatment of the Born solvation radii which are limited
by un upper bound --- MXBSolv (see below). This takes account of the
overestimation of the desolvation of charges by the pairwise de-screening
potential in ACE1.
4. MXBSolv
The Born solvation radii of all atoms (charges) are limited
by the upper bound parameter MXBSolv (default 14.0 Angstrom).
4. TBSOl
In the ACE2 potential, the conventional conversion of the atomic
solvation to the Born solvation radii is applied until a Born radius
of TBSOlv is obtained ("turning point"). After that, atomic solvation
energies (i.e., the de-solvation) is converted in a way that prevents
the Born solvation radii from exceeding the imposed maximum.
Details will be given in an upcoming publication.
4. TBSHyd
This parameter has the same meaning as TBSOl, but applies
to hydrogens, which are most susceptible to an overestimation
of the desolvation by neighboring atoms (volumes). The smaller
the TBSOl and TBSHyd, the more the over-desceening is counter-
acted (parametrization in progress).
Top
Examples
To set up simulations/minimizations with the ACE solvation potential,
read the standard CHARMM topology and parameter files and the corresponding
ACE parameter file using
read ACEParameters card unit IUN
e.g., the file acepar19.inp with param19 parameters.
The following energy call is expected to be adequate for most cases,
including proteins:
ENERgy ATOM ACE2 IEPS 1.0 SEPS 80.0 ALPHa 1.3 SIGMa 2.5 SWITch -
VDIS VSWI CUTNB 13.0 CTONNB 8.0 CTOFNB 12.0
When you run molecular dynamics or minimization with ACE, you get
two more lines in the log file printout with energy terms, e.g.,
DYNA DYN: Step Time TOTEner TOTKe ENERgy TEMPerature
DYNA PROP: GRMS HFCTote HFCKe EHFCor VIRKe
DYNA INTERN: BONDs ANGLes UREY-b DIHEdrals IMPRopers
DYNA EXTERN: VDWaals ELEC HBONds ASP USER
DYNA PRESS: VIRE VIRI PRESSE PRESSI VOLUme
DYNA ACE1: HYDRophobic SELF SCREENing COULomb
DYNA ACE2: SOLVation INTERaction
---------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
DYNA> 0 0.00000 -3423.29671 0.00000 -3423.29671 0.00000
DYNA PROP> 4.45310 -3423.12228 0.52327 0.17442 -532.70519
DYNA INTERN> 6.58717 60.43092 0.00000 56.00750 7.32144
DYNA EXTERN> -380.26218 -3173.38156 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
DYNA PRESS> 0.00000 355.13679 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
DYNA ACE1> 109.04469 -3829.20991 2750.59427 -2203.81062
DYNA ACE2> -1078.61564 546.78365
---------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
and the same during minimization (MINI...) or after
an energy calculation (ENER...).
The terms in lines with ACE1 and ACE2 are:
HYDRophobic: Hydrophobic potential, equivalent to a surface based
solvation term proportional to the sigma input parameter;
SELF: Self contribution to electrostatic solvation free energy,
Delta-E_self, first term of eq(8) (i.e., sum over all atomic
solvation energies, Delta-E_self_i, eq(28));
SCREENing: Interaction contribution to electrostatic solvation free energy,
i.e., screening of Coulomb interactions, eq(38) (sum over all
atom pairs, including bonded and 1-3 atom pairs!);
COULomb: Coulomb energy with constant dielectric of EPSI (sum over
all atom pairs for the first term in eq(36) -- excluding
bonded and 1-3 atom pairs, and 1-4 atom pair contributions
scaled with E14FAC);
SOLVation: Electrostatic (!) solvation free energy, sum of SELF and
SCREENing;
INTERaction: Electrostatic interaction, sum of SCREENing and COULomb
(eq(36), but taking account of the bonded, 1-3, and 1-4
exclusion in the Coulomb term, see above).
The term "ELEC" in line "DYNA EXTERN>..." is the total electrostatic energy:
ELEC: Sum of SELF, SCREENing, COULomb.
Equation numbers refer to Schaefer & Karplus, J. Phys. Chem. 100 (1996), 1578.
See also: test cases c27test/ace1.inp and c29test/ace_v2.inp.
Examples
To set up simulations/minimizations with the ACE solvation potential,
read the standard CHARMM topology and parameter files and the corresponding
ACE parameter file using
read ACEParameters card unit IUN
e.g., the file acepar19.inp with param19 parameters.
The following energy call is expected to be adequate for most cases,
including proteins:
ENERgy ATOM ACE2 IEPS 1.0 SEPS 80.0 ALPHa 1.3 SIGMa 2.5 SWITch -
VDIS VSWI CUTNB 13.0 CTONNB 8.0 CTOFNB 12.0
When you run molecular dynamics or minimization with ACE, you get
two more lines in the log file printout with energy terms, e.g.,
DYNA DYN: Step Time TOTEner TOTKe ENERgy TEMPerature
DYNA PROP: GRMS HFCTote HFCKe EHFCor VIRKe
DYNA INTERN: BONDs ANGLes UREY-b DIHEdrals IMPRopers
DYNA EXTERN: VDWaals ELEC HBONds ASP USER
DYNA PRESS: VIRE VIRI PRESSE PRESSI VOLUme
DYNA ACE1: HYDRophobic SELF SCREENing COULomb
DYNA ACE2: SOLVation INTERaction
---------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
DYNA> 0 0.00000 -3423.29671 0.00000 -3423.29671 0.00000
DYNA PROP> 4.45310 -3423.12228 0.52327 0.17442 -532.70519
DYNA INTERN> 6.58717 60.43092 0.00000 56.00750 7.32144
DYNA EXTERN> -380.26218 -3173.38156 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
DYNA PRESS> 0.00000 355.13679 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
DYNA ACE1> 109.04469 -3829.20991 2750.59427 -2203.81062
DYNA ACE2> -1078.61564 546.78365
---------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
and the same during minimization (MINI...) or after
an energy calculation (ENER...).
The terms in lines with ACE1 and ACE2 are:
HYDRophobic: Hydrophobic potential, equivalent to a surface based
solvation term proportional to the sigma input parameter;
SELF: Self contribution to electrostatic solvation free energy,
Delta-E_self, first term of eq(8) (i.e., sum over all atomic
solvation energies, Delta-E_self_i, eq(28));
SCREENing: Interaction contribution to electrostatic solvation free energy,
i.e., screening of Coulomb interactions, eq(38) (sum over all
atom pairs, including bonded and 1-3 atom pairs!);
COULomb: Coulomb energy with constant dielectric of EPSI (sum over
all atom pairs for the first term in eq(36) -- excluding
bonded and 1-3 atom pairs, and 1-4 atom pair contributions
scaled with E14FAC);
SOLVation: Electrostatic (!) solvation free energy, sum of SELF and
SCREENing;
INTERaction: Electrostatic interaction, sum of SCREENing and COULomb
(eq(36), but taking account of the bonded, 1-3, and 1-4
exclusion in the Coulomb term, see above).
The term "ELEC" in line "DYNA EXTERN>..." is the total electrostatic energy:
ELEC: Sum of SELF, SCREENing, COULomb.
Equation numbers refer to Schaefer & Karplus, J. Phys. Chem. 100 (1996), 1578.
See also: test cases c27test/ace1.inp and c29test/ace_v2.inp.